Critical Thinking: Which Kinds of Complexity Govern Optimal Reasoning Length?

AI-generated keywords: Deterministic Finite Automata

AI-generated Key Points

  • <Deterministic Finite Automata>: The use of DFAs in analyzing optimal reasoning lengths.
  • <Task Structure>: How task structure affects optimal reasoning lengths.
  • <Optimal Reasoning Lengths>: Identification and significance of optimal reasoning lengths.
  • <COT-RL Training>: Comparison between models trained using COT-RL and non-COT-RL methods.
  • <DFA-Based Framework>: Utilization of DFA formalism in characterizing task complexity and identifying critical reasoning lengths.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Celine Lee, Alexander M. Rush, Keyon Vafa

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often benefit from verbalized reasoning at inference time, but it remains unclear which aspects of task difficulty these extra reasoning tokens address. To investigate this question, we formalize a framework using deterministic finite automata (DFAs). DFAs offer a formalism through which we can characterize task complexity through measurable properties such as run length (number of reasoning steps required) and state-space size (decision complexity). We first show that across different tasks and models of different sizes and training paradigms, there exists an optimal amount of reasoning tokens such that the probability of producing a correct solution is maximized. We then investigate which properties of complexity govern this critical length: we find that task instances with longer corresponding underlying DFA runs (i.e. demand greater latent state-tracking requirements) correlate with longer reasoning lengths, but, surprisingly, that DFA size (i.e. state-space complexity) does not. We then demonstrate an implication of these findings: being able to predict the optimal number of reasoning tokens for new problems and filtering out non-optimal length answers results in consistent accuracy improvements.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Apr. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2504.01935v1

In this study, the researchers utilized deterministic finite automata (DFAs) to analyze the impact of task structure on optimal reasoning lengths in Large Language Models (LLMs). The framework established through DFA formalism allowed for the characterization of task complexity based on measurable properties such as run length and state-space size. The findings revealed that there exists an optimal number of reasoning tokens that maximizes the probability of producing correct solutions across various tasks and models. One key observation was that accuracy tends to decline after surpassing the critical reasoning length, a phenomenon also noted in previous studies. <Deterministic Finite Automata>: The use of DFAs in analyzing optimal reasoning lengths. <Task Structure>: How task structure affects optimal reasoning lengths. <Optimal Reasoning Lengths>: Identification and significance of optimal reasoning lengths. <COT-RL Training>: Comparison between models trained using COT-RL and non-COT-RL methods. <DFA-Based Framework>: Utilization of DFA formalism in characterizing task complexity and identifying critical reasoning lengths. While DFA theory suggests models could theoretically maintain correctness with indefinite reasoning steps, factors like redundant reasoning, backtracking, or generation noise may lead to deviations from optimal performance. Furthermore, models trained using chain-of-thought reinforcement learning (COT-RL) exhibited longer reasoning chains and higher accuracy compared to non-COT-RL counterparts. Future research could explore how COT-RL training influences model-generated reasoning lengths and their alignment with optimal values indicated by DFA run length. The study also highlighted the challenge of extending the DFA framework to complex tasks like CRUXEval, which involve large implicit program states. By investigating alternate DFA representations for different tasks and assessing their impact on optimal reasoning lengths and overall performance, insights into effective prompting and inference strategies could be gained. Additionally, future work may focus on developing advanced predictors of critical length beyond linear regression models. Utilizing LLM-based methods incorporating textual descriptions or minimal demonstrations could enhance the practical usability of critical length-based filtering across diverse reasoning scenarios. In conclusion, this paper contributes a comprehensive analysis of how task structural properties influence optimal test-time reasoning in LLMs using a DFA-based framework. The empirical findings shed light on the importance of identifying critical reasoning lengths for improved model performance across various tasks and training paradigms.
Created on 03 Apr. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.