Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2504.07986v1

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's o1-series have demonstrated impressive capabilities in handling complex reasoning tasks through the extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning mechanism. However, studies have uncovered significant redundancy in the CoT reasoning traces, resulting in increased inference latency and decreased model performance due to unnecessary diversion of attention towards irrelevant reasoning paths. To address this issue, a detailed analysis was conducted on the internal reasoning structures of LLMs, categorizing them into three primary thought types: execution thoughts for problem-solving step-by-step analysis, reflection thoughts for verification pauses during reasoning, and transition thoughts for shifting perspectives in problem-solving flow. The study revealed that an excess of reflection and transition thoughts were strongly associated with failure cases, with clear separation observed in the latent space among these thought categories. Building upon these findings, a novel approach named SEAL (Steerable Reasoning Calibration) was introduced as a training-free method to effectively calibrate the CoT process. SEAL involves an offline stage for extracting the steering vector in the latent space and an on-the-fly calibration of the reasoning trace through representation intervention using this vector. Notably, the steering vector demonstrated high transferability across various tasks. Extensive experiments were conducted across multiple models (DeepSeek-R1-Distill and QwQ-32B-Preview) and benchmarks (Math500, GSM8K, LiveCodeBench), validating SEAL's effectiveness. The results showed up to an 11% improvement in accuracy while reducing reasoning tokens by 11.8% to 50.4%. The code for SEAL is publicly available on GitHub. Further investigation delved into analyzing fine-grained reasoning patterns of LLMs utilizing CoT processes by segmenting generated output into interconnected thoughts categorized as execution thoughts for step-by-step problem-solving analysis, reflecting thoughts for verification pauses during reasoning, and transition thoughts for shifting perspectives in problem-solving flow. Statistical analysis revealed that incorrect samples exhibited higher numbers of thoughts compared to correct ones due to excessive reflection and transition steps introducing redundancy beyond necessary reasoning processes. The study highlighted two major flaws in current LLM reasoning processes: efficiency concerns arising from frequent reflection and transition thoughts consuming significant token budgets leading to computational overhead; effectiveness issues stemming from distraction caused by these unnecessary thoughts resulting in suboptimal performance due to deviation from essential reasoning paths. Moving forward, efforts are focused on analyzing different thought roles within the latent space and developing a controllable approach to mitigate redundant reflection and transition thoughts for enhancing both efficiency and effectiveness of LLM reasoning processes.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's o1-series excel in complex reasoning tasks through extended chain-of-thought (CoT) mechanism
• - Studies reveal significant redundancy in CoT reasoning traces, leading to increased inference latency and decreased model performance
• - LLMs' internal reasoning structures categorized into execution thoughts, reflection thoughts, and transition thoughts
• - Excess of reflection and transition thoughts linked to failure cases with clear separation in latent space
• - SEAL (Steerable Reasoning Calibration) introduced as training-free method to calibrate CoT process using steering vector in latent space
• - SEAL demonstrated high transferability across tasks with up to 11% accuracy improvement and reduced reasoning tokens by 11.8% to 50.4%
• - Fine-grained analysis of LLMs' CoT processes revealed inefficiency due to excessive reflection and transition thoughts leading to computational overhead
• - Focus on developing controllable approach to mitigate redundant reflection and transition thoughts for improved efficiency and effectiveness of LLM reasoning processes

Summary1. Big smart computer programs like OpenAI's o1-series are really good at solving hard problems by thinking through lots of ideas. 2. Some research shows that these programs sometimes think about the same things too many times, which makes them slower and less accurate. 3. These programs have different types of thoughts inside them, like doing things, thinking about what they did, and moving from one idea to another. 4. Too much thinking about what they did and switching between ideas can cause these programs to make mistakes and waste time. 5. A new method called SEAL helps these programs work better by adjusting how they think without needing extra training. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big computer programs that are really good at understanding and generating human language. - Chain-of-Thought (CoT) mechanism: The way these programs connect different ideas together to solve problems. - Inference latency: The time it takes for the program to come up with an answer or make a decision. - Reasoning structures: Different types of thoughts and processes inside the program that help it solve problems. - Latent space: A hidden space where the program stores information in a way that is not directly visible. - Steerable Reasoning Calibration (SEAL): A method that helps adjust how the program thinks without needing extra training or instructions. - Transferability: How well a method or technique can be used on different tasks or problems effectively.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been making headlines in recent years for their impressive capabilities in handling complex reasoning tasks. These models, such as OpenAI's o1-series, utilize an extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning mechanism to solve problems. However, a recent study has uncovered significant redundancy in the CoT reasoning traces, leading to decreased model performance and increased inference latency. To address this issue, researchers conducted a detailed analysis of the internal reasoning structures of LLMs. They categorized these structures into three primary thought types: execution thoughts for problem-solving step-by-step analysis, reflection thoughts for verification pauses during reasoning, and transition thoughts for shifting perspectives in problem-solving flow. The study revealed that an excess of reflection and transition thoughts were strongly associated with failure cases. There was also a clear separation observed in the latent space among these thought categories. This finding suggests that excessive use of these types of thoughts can lead to suboptimal performance. Building upon these findings, the researchers introduced a novel approach called SEAL (Steerable Reasoning Calibration). SEAL is a training-free method that effectively calibrates the CoT process by using an offline stage for extracting a steering vector in the latent space and on-the-fly calibration through representation intervention using this vector. One notable aspect of SEAL is its high transferability across various tasks. The researchers conducted extensive experiments on multiple models (DeepSeek-R1-Distill and QwQ-32B-Preview) and benchmarks (Math500, GSM8K, LiveCodeBench), which validated its effectiveness. The results showed up to an 11% improvement in accuracy while reducing reasoning tokens by 11.8% to 50.4%. Additionally, the code for SEAL is publicly available on GitHub. Further investigation delved into analyzing fine-grained reasoning patterns of LLMs utilizing CoT processes by segmenting generated output into interconnected thoughts categorized as execution thoughts for step-by-step problem-solving analysis, reflecting thoughts for verification pauses during reasoning, and transition thoughts for shifting perspectives in problem-solving flow. Statistical analysis revealed that incorrect samples exhibited higher numbers of thoughts compared to correct ones due to excessive reflection and transition steps introducing redundancy beyond necessary reasoning processes. This study highlighted two major flaws in current LLM reasoning processes: efficiency concerns arising from frequent reflection and transition thoughts consuming significant token budgets leading to computational overhead; effectiveness issues stemming from distraction caused by these unnecessary thoughts resulting in suboptimal performance due to deviation from essential reasoning paths. Moving forward, efforts are focused on analyzing different thought roles within the latent space and developing a controllable approach to mitigate redundant reflection and transition thoughts for enhancing both efficiency and effectiveness of LLM reasoning processes. In conclusion, this research paper provides valuable insights into the internal reasoning structures of LLMs and highlights the need for more efficient and effective CoT processes. The introduction of SEAL as a training-free method shows promising results in addressing these issues. This study opens up new avenues for future research in improving the capabilities of large language models.