Agentic AI systems are rapidly transforming the landscape of intelligence, autonomy, collaboration, and decision-making in various sectors. This review focuses on Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) within the context of Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS) powered by large language models (LLMs). It delves into the foundational concepts of Agentic AI and highlights its architectural differences from traditional AI agents. The framework for TRiSM in Agentic AI is structured around four pillars: Governance, Explainability, ModelOps, and Privacy/Security. These pillars are tailored to address the challenges specific to multi-agent LLM systems. A novel risk taxonomy is introduced to capture unique threats like prompt injection and memory poisoning in Agentic AI. Additionally, two new metrics - Component Synergy Score (CSS) and Tool Utilization Efficacy (TUE) - are proposed to assess inter-agent collaboration quality and tool efficiency. The review also discusses advanced techniques such as LIME and SHAP for enhancing explainability and advocates for robust security measures like prompt hygiene and homomorphic encryption to mitigate vulnerabilities. Looking ahead, the research roadmap emphasizes scalable, verifiable, and regulation-compliant Agentic AI systems. Future work should focus on advancing adversarial robustness, refining governance protocols, and establishing standardized benchmarks for trustworthiness and coordination. By aligning Agentic AI development with TRiSM principles , researchers can ensure responsible integration of these innovative systems into society. This review stands out by integrating TRiSM principles into the study of LLM-based multi-agent systems with a focus on critical domains like healthcare , science ,and finance . Unlike previous studies that overlook governance and security aspects , this work prioritizes these elements as fundamental design considerations. It provides actionable guidance for researchers while addressing targeted threats like backdoor attacks in distributed LLMs and governance challenges related to regulatory compliance across autonomous agents. The literature review methodology followed best practices in systematic reviews to ensure thorough coverage and rigor. Key research objectives included identifying trustworthiness challenges in Agentic AI systems enabled by LLMs; exploring technical strategies to address these challenges; mapping existing approaches onto TRiSM pillars; identifying gaps in current research; and outlining promising directions for future work. Overall trends show a significant increase in Agentic AI research post-2023 with a growing focus on governance and safety topics within the TRiSM framework. This comprehensive review fills critical gaps in both technical multi-agent literature and broader responsible AI landscape while providing valuable insights for researchers, engineers, policymakers involved in developing trustworthy Agentic AI systems.
- - Agentic AI systems are rapidly transforming intelligence, autonomy, collaboration, and decision-making in various sectors
- - Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) framework for Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS) powered by large language models (LLMs)
- - Four pillars of TRiSM in Agentic AI: Governance, Explainability, ModelOps, Privacy/Security
- - Introduction of a novel risk taxonomy to capture unique threats in Agentic AI like prompt injection and memory poisoning
- - Proposal of new metrics - Component Synergy Score (CSS) and Tool Utilization Efficacy (TUE) - to assess inter-agent collaboration quality and tool efficiency
- - Advocacy for advanced techniques like LIME and SHAP for enhancing explainability and robust security measures such as prompt hygiene and homomorphic encryption
- - Research roadmap emphasizes scalable, verifiable, regulation-compliant Agentic AI systems focusing on advancing adversarial robustness and refining governance protocols
- - Integration of TRiSM principles into the study of LLM-based multi-agent systems with a focus on critical domains like healthcare, science, and finance
- - Prioritization of governance and security aspects as fundamental design considerations with actionable guidance for researchers addressing targeted threats like backdoor attacks in distributed LLMs
- These key points summarize the text's discussion on Trust, Risk, and Security Management within the context of Agentic AI systems powered by large language models.
SummaryAgentic AI systems are smart machines that are changing how things work in different areas. A framework called TRiSM helps manage trust, risk, and security for these systems. TRiSM has four important parts: Governance, Explainability, ModelOps, and Privacy/Security. New ways to understand risks in Agentic AI are introduced, along with new measures to check how well the machines work together. Special methods like LIME and SHAP are suggested to make the machines more understandable and secure.
Definitions- Agentic AI systems: Smart machines that can think and make decisions on their own.
- Autonomy: The ability of a machine to work independently without human control.
- Collaboration: Working together with others towards a common goal.
- Decision-making: The process of choosing between different options or courses of action.
- Trust: Believing in the reliability or truth of something or someone.
- Risk: The possibility of harm or loss.
- Security: Measures taken to protect against threats or dangers.
- Framework: A basic structure used as a guide for organizing something.
- Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS): Systems where multiple agents (like robots or software) work together towards a goal.
- Large language models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that understand and generate human language effectively.
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been rapidly evolving and transforming various sectors, from healthcare to finance. One of the latest developments in AI is the emergence of agentic AI systems, which are powered by large language models (LLMs). These systems have the ability to make autonomous decisions and collaborate with other agents, leading to a significant shift in traditional AI approaches.
However, as these agentic AI systems become more prevalent, there are growing concerns about trust, risk, and security management (TRiSM). This review focuses on exploring TRiSM within the context of agentic multi-agent systems (AMAS) enabled by LLMs. It delves into the foundational concepts of agentic AI and highlights its architectural differences from traditional AI agents. The framework for TRiSM in Agentic AI is structured around four pillars: Governance, Explainability, ModelOps, and Privacy/Security.
Agentic Artificial Intelligence
Agentic artificial intelligence refers to a type of intelligent system that can act autonomously and make decisions based on its own understanding of data without human intervention. Unlike traditional rule-based or algorithmic approaches where humans define specific rules or algorithms for decision-making processes, agentic AI relies on large language models (LLMs) that learn patterns from vast amounts of data.
These LLMs are trained using deep learning techniques such as neural networks to process natural language inputs and generate outputs that mimic human-like responses. They have shown remarkable performance in tasks such as text generation, translation, question-answering, and even image recognition.
Architectural Differences between Traditional AI Agents and Agentic Agents
Traditional AI agents follow a top-down approach where humans provide explicit instructions or rules for decision-making. In contrast, agentic agents use bottom-up learning methods to understand patterns from data without being explicitly programmed by humans.
Additionally, traditional AI agents are typically single entities, while agentic agents are composed of multiple sub-agents that can collaborate and make decisions together. This architectural difference has significant implications for TRiSM in agentic AI systems.
Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) Framework
The TRiSM framework for agentic AI is structured around four pillars: Governance, Explainability, ModelOps, and Privacy/Security. These pillars are tailored to address the challenges specific to multi-agent LLM systems.
Governance
Governance refers to the processes and protocols that govern the behavior of agentic agents within a system. In traditional AI approaches, humans have full control over decision-making processes. However, in agentic AI systems with multiple autonomous agents collaborating together, governance becomes more complex.
It is crucial to establish clear guidelines and protocols for how these agents should interact with each other and make decisions. This includes defining roles and responsibilities for each agent as well as establishing mechanisms for resolving conflicts or errors.
Explainability
Explainability refers to the ability of an AI system to explain its decision-making process in a way that humans can understand. With traditional rule-based or algorithmic approaches, it is relatively easy to trace back the reasoning behind a decision. However, with LLMs powering agentic agents, it becomes challenging to interpret their decision-making process.
To ensure trustworthiness in agentic AI systems, it is essential to enhance explainability by using techniques such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) or Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). These methods provide insights into how an LLM arrived at a particular decision by highlighting important features or inputs that influenced its output.
ModelOps
ModelOps refers to the operationalization of AI models, including their deployment, monitoring, and maintenance. In agentic AI systems, where multiple agents collaborate to make decisions, it is crucial to have a robust ModelOps process in place.
This includes continuously monitoring the performance of LLMs and identifying potential issues such as prompt injection or memory poisoning that could compromise the integrity of the system. It also involves regularly updating and retraining these models to ensure they are up-to-date with current data.
Privacy/Security
Privacy and security are critical considerations in any AI system but become even more crucial in agentic AI systems powered by LLMs. These systems often deal with sensitive data such as personal information or financial records, making them vulnerable to attacks from malicious actors.
To mitigate these risks, it is essential to implement robust security measures such as prompt hygiene (ensuring that prompts used for training LLMs do not contain sensitive information) and homomorphic encryption (allowing for secure computation on encrypted data). This ensures that the privacy of individuals' data is protected while still allowing for efficient collaboration between agents.
Novel Risk Taxonomy
A novel risk taxonomy is introduced in this review specifically tailored for agentic AI systems enabled by LLMs. This taxonomy captures unique threats like prompt injection and memory poisoning that are specific to these types of systems.
Prompt injection refers to the insertion of biased or harmful prompts during training that can influence an LLM's decision-making process. Memory poisoning occurs when an attacker manipulates an agent's memory through inputs or outputs, leading to incorrect decision-making.
By identifying these targeted risks, researchers can develop strategies to mitigate them effectively and ensure trustworthiness in agentic AI systems.
New Metrics: Component Synergy Score (CSS) & Tool Utilization Efficacy (TUE)
In addition to introducing a new risk taxonomy, this review also proposes two new metrics - Component Synergy Score (CSS) and Tool Utilization Efficacy (TUE) - to assess the quality of inter-agent collaboration and tool efficiency in agentic AI systems.
The Component Synergy Score measures how well different agents work together towards a common goal, while the Tool Utilization Efficacy measures the effectiveness of tools used by these agents. These metrics provide valuable insights into the performance of agentic AI systems and can guide researchers in improving their design and implementation.
Research Roadmap for TRiSM in Agentic AI
The research roadmap outlined in this review emphasizes three key areas for future work: scalability, verifiability, and regulation-compliance. As agentic AI systems become more prevalent, it is crucial to ensure that they can scale effectively to handle large amounts of data without compromising their performance or security.
Verifiability refers to the ability to verify an agent's decision-making process and ensure that it aligns with ethical principles. This involves developing techniques for auditing LLMs' outputs as well as establishing standardized benchmarks for trustworthiness and coordination between agents.
Finally, regulation-compliance is essential for responsible integration of agentic AI systems into society. This includes addressing governance challenges related to regulatory compliance across autonomous agents as well as advancing adversarial robustness against attacks from malicious actors.
Conclusion
This comprehensive review highlights the importance of considering TRiSM principles when developing agentic AI systems enabled by LLMs. By integrating governance, explainability, ModelOps, and privacy/security considerations into the design process, researchers can ensure responsible integration of these innovative systems into society.
Unlike previous studies that overlook governance and security aspects, this review prioritizes these elements