Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach
Authors: Rania Béji (UM, MRM), Ouidad Yousfi (UM, MRM), Abdelwahed Omri
AI-generated Key Points
- The authors critically review the existing literature on the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance features.
- They develop a theoretical model that explicitly links board diversity, CSR committees' attributes, CSR, and financial performance.
- Board diversity in terms of gender, ethnicity, age, education level, professional background, and experience can enhance cognitive diversity within boards.
- Studying the attributes of CSR committees such as their size, composition (e.g., internal vs. external members), mandate (e.g., advisory vs. decision-making), resources (e.g., budget), reporting lines (e.g., to CEO or board), and accountability mechanisms (e.g., monitoring) is crucial for understanding how these committees influence firms' CSR practices.
- A deeper understanding of the relationship between CSR and corporate governance requires considering not only structural features but also cognitive aspects such as decision-making processes, values, beliefs, and attitudes.
- This chapter provides practical implications for policymakers interested in promoting responsible business practices by highlighting ways to enhance board diversity and optimize the functioning of CSR committees within organizations.
Abstract: This chapter aims to critically review the existing literature on the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance features. Drawn on management and corporate governance theories, we develop a theoretical model that makes explicit the links between board diversity, CSR committees' attributes, CSR and financial performance. Particularly, we show that focusing on the cognitive and demographic characteristics of board members could provide more insights on the link between corporate governance and CSR. We also highlight how the functioning and the composition of CSR committees, could be valuable to better understand the relationship between corporate governance and CSR.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.