Multiview Transformers for Video Recognition

Authors: Shen Yan, Xuehan Xiong, Anurag Arnab, Zhichao Lu, Mi Zhang, Chen Sun, Cordelia Schmid

Technical report
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2201.04288v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper introduces Multiview Transformers for Video Recognition (MTV), a model that addresses the challenge of reasoning at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions in video understanding. While transformer architectures have advanced the state-of-the-art, they have not explicitly modeled different spatiotemporal resolutions. MTV overcomes this limitation by utilizing separate encoders to represent different views of the input video and fusing information across views through lateral connections. The authors conduct extensive ablation studies and demonstrate that MTV consistently outperforms single-view counterparts in terms of accuracy and computational cost across various model sizes. Additionally, MTV achieves state-of-the-art results on five standard datasets and further improves performance with large-scale pretraining. The paper concludes by acknowledging limitations and suggesting future research directions such as exploring datasets beyond Kinetics and reducing dependence on supervised pretraining. Overall, the proposed method presents a promising approach to capturing multi-resolution temporal context in transformer architectures for video recognition tasks.
AI-generated keywords: MTV Transformers Video Recognition Multi-resolution Pretraining

AI-generated Key Points

  • Multiview Transformers for Video Recognition (MTV) is introduced as a model for reasoning at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions in video understanding.
  • MTV utilizes separate encoders to represent different views of the input video and fuses information across views through lateral connections.
  • Extensive ablation studies show that MTV consistently outperforms single-view counterparts in terms of accuracy and computational cost across various model sizes.
  • MTV achieves state-of-the-art results on five standard datasets and improves performance with large-scale pretraining.
  • Future research directions include exploring datasets beyond Kinetics and reducing dependence on supervised pretraining.
  • The proposed method presents a promising approach to capturing multi-resolution temporal context in transformer architectures for video recognition tasks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Video understanding requires reasoning at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions -- from short fine-grained motions to events taking place over longer durations. Although transformer architectures have recently advanced the state-of-the-art, they have not explicitly modelled different spatiotemporal resolutions. To this end, we present Multiview Transformers for Video Recognition (MTV). Our model consists of separate encoders to represent different views of the input video with lateral connections to fuse information across views. We present thorough ablation studies of our model and show that MTV consistently performs better than single-view counterparts in terms of accuracy and computational cost across a range of model sizes. Furthermore, we achieve state-of-the-art results on five standard datasets, and improve even further with large-scale pretraining. We will release code and pretrained checkpoints.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Jan. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.