AI summary · arXiv: 2209.13385v1 · q-bio.QM

Beyond Heart Murmur Detection: Automatic Murmur Grading from Phonocardiogram

Andoni Elola, Elisabete Aramendi, Jorge Oliveira, Francesco Renna, Miguel T. Coimbra, Matthew A. Reyna, Reza Sameni, Gari D. Clifford,

and 1 more authorAli Bahrami Rad

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 27 Sep. 2022 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The study aims to develop an algorithmic approach for automatic murmur grading from phonocardiograms (PCGs) of a large population of pediatric patients from a low-resource rural area.
  • Murmurs are abnormal heart sounds that can be identified by experts through cardiac auscultation, and the murmur grade is strongly correlated with the patient's clinical condition.
  • The proposed method uses Mel spectrogram representation of each PCG recording and an ensemble of 15 convolutional residual neural networks with channel-wise attention mechanisms to classify each PCG recording.
  • The final murmur grade for each patient is derived based on the proposed decision rule and considering all estimated labels for available recordings.
  • The method was cross-validated on a dataset consisting of 3456 PCG recordings from 1007 patients using a stratified ten-fold cross-validation and tested on a hidden test set comprised of 1538 PCG recordings from 442 patients.
  • The overall cross-validation performances for patient-level murmur gradings are 86.3% in terms of unweighted average sensitivities and 81.6% in terms of F1-scores.
  • On the test set, the algorithm achieved an unweighted average sensitivity score of 80.4% and an F1-score of 75.8%.
  • The sensitivities (and F1 scores) for absent, soft, and loud murmurs were 90.7% (93.6%), 75.8% (66.8%), and 92.3% (84.2%) respectively; indicating that the proposed method provides characterization beyond detection that may enhance classification accuracy in resource limited settings where expert screening costs are relatively high.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: automatic murmur grading Mel spectrogram convolutional residual neural networks pre-screening tool low-resource settings

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This study aims to develop an algorithmic approach for automatic murmur grading from phonocardiograms (PCGs) of a large population of pediatric patients from a low-resource rural area. Murmurs are abnormal heart sounds that can be identified by experts through cardiac auscultation, and the murmur grade, which is a quantitative measure of the murmur intensity, is strongly correlated with the patient's clinical condition. The proposed method uses Mel spectrogram representation of each PCG recording and an ensemble of 15 convolutional residual neural networks with channel-wise attention mechanisms to classify each PCG recording. The final murmur grade for each patient is derived based on the proposed decision rule and considering all estimated labels for available recordings. The method was cross-validated on a dataset consisting of 3456 PCG recordings from 1007 patients using a stratified ten-fold cross-validation and tested on a hidden test set comprised of 1538 PCG recordings from 442 patients. The overall cross-validation performances for patient-level murmur gradings are 86.3% in terms of unweighted average sensitivities and 81.6% in terms of F1-scores. On the test set, the algorithm achieved an unweighted average sensitivity score of 80.4% and an F1-score of 75.8%. The sensitivities (and F1 scores) for absent, soft, and loud murmurs were 90.7% (93.6%), 75.8% (66.8%), and 92.3% (84.2%) respectively; indicating that the proposed method provides characterization beyond detection that may enhance classification accuracy in resource limited settings where expert screening costs are relatively high.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.