Making Language Models Better Tool Learners with Execution Feedback

Authors: Shuofei Qiao, Honghao Gui, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang

Work in progress

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.13068v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper "Making Language Models Better Tool Learners with Execution Feedback" proposes a framework called Tool leaRning wIth exeCution fEedback (TRICE) to enable language models to selectively use tools while enhancing performance. TRICE is an end-to-end framework that enables the model to continually learn through feedback derived from tool execution. The proposed two-stage approach includes training the model on simple tasks that it can readily resolve without tools and then gradually introducing more complex tasks where tools are necessary. Experimental results show that TRICE outperforms existing methods in terms of accuracy while reducing the number of times a tool is used. The code and datasets for TRICE will be available on GitHub at https://github.com/zjunlp/trice. This paper provides a promising solution for improving language models' ability to use tools effectively, which has significant implications for various natural language processing applications.
AI-generated keywords: TRICE Tool Learning Execution Feedback Language Models NLP Applications

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper proposes a framework called Tool leaRning wIth exeCution fEedback (TRICE) to enable language models to selectively use tools while enhancing performance.
  • TRICE is an end-to-end framework that enables the model to continually learn through feedback derived from tool execution.
  • The proposed two-stage approach includes training the model on simple tasks that it can readily resolve without tools and then gradually introducing more complex tasks where tools are necessary.
  • Experimental results show that TRICE outperforms existing methods in terms of accuracy while reducing the number of times a tool is used.
  • The code and datasets for TRICE will be available on GitHub at https://github.com/zjunlp/trice.
  • This paper provides a promising solution for improving language models' ability to use tools effectively, which has significant implications for various natural language processing applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Tools serve as pivotal interfaces that enable humans to understand and reshape the world. With the advent of foundational models, AI systems can utilize tools to expand their capabilities and interact with the world. Existing tool learning methodologies, encompassing supervised fine-tuning and prompt engineering approaches, often induce language models to utilize tools indiscriminately, as complex problems often exceed their own competencies. However, introducing tools for simple tasks, which the models themselves can readily resolve, can inadvertently propagate errors rather than enhance performance. This leads to the research question: can we teach language models when and how to use tools? To meet this need, we propose Tool leaRning wIth exeCution fEedback (TRICE), a two-stage end-to-end framework that enables the model to continually learn through feedback derived from tool execution, thereby learning when and how to use tools effectively. Experimental results, backed by further analysis, show that TRICE can make the language model to selectively use tools by decreasing the model's dependency on tools while enhancing the performance. Code and datasets will be available in https://github.com/zjunlp/trice.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.