The Natural Auditor: How To Tell If Someone Used Your Words To Train Their Model
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Congzheng Song and Vitaly Shmatikov propose a novel model auditing technique
- The key contribution is the development and evaluation of an effective black-box auditing method
- The technique allows users to determine if their data was used to train a machine learning model with minimal queries
- It does not rely on numeric confidence values from the model, making it more reliable than previous approaches
- The authors successfully audit well-generalized models that are not overfitted to training data
- They explain how text-generation models memorize word sequences, making them suitable for auditing purposes
- Shedding light on how these models retain information from training data enhances transparency and accountability in machine learning practices related to user privacy protection
Authors: Congzheng Song, Vitaly Shmatikov
Abstract: To help enforce data-protection regulations such as GDPR and detect unauthorized uses of personal data, we propose a new \emph{model auditing} technique that enables users to check if their data was used to train a machine learning model. We focus on auditing deep-learning models that generate natural-language text, including word prediction and dialog generation. These models are at the core of many popular online services. Furthermore, they are often trained on very sensitive personal data, such as users' messages, searches, chats, and comments. We design and evaluate an effective black-box auditing method that can detect, with very few queries to a model, if a particular user's texts were used to train it (among thousands of other users). In contrast to prior work on membership inference against ML models, we do not assume that the model produces numeric confidence values. We empirically demonstrate that we can successfully audit models that are well-generalized and not overfitted to the training data. We also analyze how text-generation models memorize word sequences and explain why this memorization makes them amenable to auditing.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.