Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learning
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Importance of using appropriate techniques for model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning research
- Review of various methods for each task and their advantages and disadvantages
- Recommendations to promote best practices in academic research and real-world applications
- Limitations of common methods like holdout method for model evaluation and selection, especially with small datasets
- Introduction of different flavors of bootstrap technique as an alternative for estimating performance uncertainty
- Exploration of popular cross-validation techniques like leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation
- Discussion on bias-variance trade-off in choosing an appropriate value for k in k-fold cross-validation
- Practical tips for making optimal choices for k based on empirical evidence
- Coverage of statistical tests for comparing different algorithms and strategies for handling multiple comparisons
- Recommendation of alternative methods like combined F-test 5x2 cross validation and nested cross validation when working with small datasets
- Overall comprehensive review serving as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in machine learning
- Aim to enhance the quality of research outcomes while considering practical constraints such as dataset size.
Authors: Sebastian Raschka
Abstract: The correct use of model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection techniques is vital in academic machine learning research as well as in many industrial settings. This article reviews different techniques that can be used for each of these three subtasks and discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of each technique with references to theoretical and empirical studies. Further, recommendations are given to encourage best yet feasible practices in research and applications of machine learning. Common methods such as the holdout method for model evaluation and selection are covered, which are not recommended when working with small datasets. Different flavors of the bootstrap technique are introduced for estimating the uncertainty of performance estimates, as an alternative to confidence intervals via normal approximation if bootstrapping is computationally feasible. Common cross-validation techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation are reviewed, the bias-variance trade-off for choosing k is discussed, and practical tips for the optimal choice of k are given based on empirical evidence. Different statistical tests for algorithm comparisons are presented, and strategies for dealing with multiple comparisons such as omnibus tests and multiple-comparison corrections are discussed. Finally, alternative methods for algorithm selection, such as the combined F-test 5x2 cross-validation and nested cross-validation, are recommended for comparing machine learning algorithms when datasets are small.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.