Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learning

AI-generated keywords: Model Evaluation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Importance of using appropriate techniques for model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning research
  • Review of various methods for each task and their advantages and disadvantages
  • Recommendations to promote best practices in academic research and real-world applications
  • Limitations of common methods like holdout method for model evaluation and selection, especially with small datasets
  • Introduction of different flavors of bootstrap technique as an alternative for estimating performance uncertainty
  • Exploration of popular cross-validation techniques like leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation
  • Discussion on bias-variance trade-off in choosing an appropriate value for k in k-fold cross-validation
  • Practical tips for making optimal choices for k based on empirical evidence
  • Coverage of statistical tests for comparing different algorithms and strategies for handling multiple comparisons
  • Recommendation of alternative methods like combined F-test 5x2 cross validation and nested cross validation when working with small datasets
  • Overall comprehensive review serving as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in machine learning
  • Aim to enhance the quality of research outcomes while considering practical constraints such as dataset size.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sebastian Raschka

v3 (Nov 2020): Fixes SD from pooled proportions in Sec 4.2 Fixes exact binomial p-value in Sec 4.4 by using max(B, C) instead of B in the sum. Fixes typo using wrong symbols in Looney's F-test's SSA in Sec 4.7

Abstract: The correct use of model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection techniques is vital in academic machine learning research as well as in many industrial settings. This article reviews different techniques that can be used for each of these three subtasks and discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of each technique with references to theoretical and empirical studies. Further, recommendations are given to encourage best yet feasible practices in research and applications of machine learning. Common methods such as the holdout method for model evaluation and selection are covered, which are not recommended when working with small datasets. Different flavors of the bootstrap technique are introduced for estimating the uncertainty of performance estimates, as an alternative to confidence intervals via normal approximation if bootstrapping is computationally feasible. Common cross-validation techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation are reviewed, the bias-variance trade-off for choosing k is discussed, and practical tips for the optimal choice of k are given based on empirical evidence. Different statistical tests for algorithm comparisons are presented, and strategies for dealing with multiple comparisons such as omnibus tests and multiple-comparison corrections are discussed. Finally, alternative methods for algorithm selection, such as the combined F-test 5x2 cross-validation and nested cross-validation, are recommended for comparing machine learning algorithms when datasets are small.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Nov. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1811.12808v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The article "Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learning" by Sebastian Raschka emphasizes the importance of using appropriate techniques for model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning research. The author reviews various methods that can be employed for each of these tasks and discusses their advantages and disadvantages based on theoretical and empirical studies. The article provides recommendations to promote best practices in both academic research and real-world applications of machine learning. It highlights the limitations of common methods like the holdout method for model evaluation and selection, particularly when dealing with small datasets. Instead, the author introduces different flavors of the bootstrap technique as an alternative for estimating performance uncertainty. This approach proves useful when bootstrapping is computationally feasible. Additionally, the article explores popular cross-validation techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation. It delves into the bias-variance trade-off associated with choosing an appropriate value for k in k-fold cross-validation. Practical tips are provided to aid researchers in making optimal choices for k based on empirical evidence. The article also covers statistical tests for comparing different algorithms and addresses strategies for handling multiple comparisons, including omnibus tests and multiple comparison corrections. Furthermore, it recommends alternative methods like the combined F-test 5x2 cross validation and nested cross validation when working with small datasets to facilitate algorithm selection. Overall, this comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in machine learning by providing insights into effective techniques for model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection. The recommendations presented aim to enhance the quality of research outcomes while considering practical constraints such as dataset size.
Created on 11 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.