Clusters Have Edges: The Projected Phase SpaceStructure of SDSS redMaPPer Clusters

AI-generated keywords: Edge Radius Galaxy Clusters Line-of-sight Velocities Phase Space Structure Splashback Radius

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigates the distribution of line-of-sight velocities of galaxies near SDSS redMaPPer galaxy clusters.
  • Galaxies are classified into two groups: those dynamically associated with the cluster and random line-of-sight projections.
  • Both the fraction of galaxies associated with the clusters and the velocity dispersion exhibit a distinct feature at a radial scale known as the "edge radius" (R_edge).
  • R_edge is approximately 2.2 times the cluster radius assigned by redMaPPer (R_lambda) and represents a true "cluster edge."
  • A model is proposed that divides galaxies associated with a cluster into two components: orbiting galaxies within the halo and infalling galaxies.
  • This model provides an explanation for the observed sharp feature in both fraction and velocity dispersion profiles.
  • The significance of R_edge is supported by a companion paper that investigates three-dimensional phase space distributions of dark matter substructures in numerical simulations.
  • R_edge coincides with a suitably defined splashback radius in the companion paper's findings.
  • The study sheds light on the projected phase space structure of SDSS redMaPPer galaxy clusters and highlights the absence of orbiting structures beyond R_edge.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Paxton Tomooka, Eduardo Rozo, Erika L. Wagoner, Han Aung, Daisuke Nagai, Sasha Safonova

arXiv: 2003.11555v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
10 pages, 5 figures, submitted to MNRAS, companion paper to Aung et al. 2020

Abstract: We study the distribution of line-of-sight velocities of galaxies in the vicinity of SDSS redMaPPer galaxy clusters. Based on their velocities, galaxies can be split into two categories: galaxies that are dynamically associated with the cluster, and random line-of-sight projections. Both the fraction of galaxies associated with the galaxy clusters, and the velocity dispersion of the same, exhibit a sharp feature as a function of radius. The feature occurs at a radial scale $R_{\rm edge} \approx 2.2R_{\rm{\lambda}}$, where $R_{\rm{\lambda}}$ is the cluster radius assigned by redMaPPer. We refer to $R_{\rm edge}$ as the "edge radius." These results are naturally explained by a model that further splits the galaxies dynamically associated with a galaxy cluster into a component of galaxies orbiting the halo and an infalling galaxy component. The edge radius $R_{\rm edge}$ constitutes a true "cluster edge", in the sense that no orbiting structures exist past this radius. A companion paper (Aung et al. 2020) tests whether the "halo edge" hypothesis holds when investigating the full three-dimensional phase space distribution of dark matter substructures in numerical simulations, and demonstrates that this radius coincides with a suitably defined splashback radius.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Mar. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2003.11555v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this study, the authors investigate the distribution of line-of-sight velocities of galaxies near SDSS redMaPPer galaxy clusters. By analyzing the velocities, they classify galaxies into two groups: those that are dynamically associated with the cluster and those that are random line-of-sight projections. The authors find that both the fraction of galaxies associated with the clusters and the velocity dispersion exhibit a distinct feature as a function of radius. Interestingly, this feature occurs at a radial scale known as the "edge radius," denoted as R_edge, which is approximately 2.2 times the cluster radius assigned by redMaPPer (R_lambda). The edge radius represents a true "cluster edge" because no orbiting structures exist beyond this point. To explain these findings, the authors propose a model that further divides galaxies dynamically associated with a galaxy cluster into two components: one consisting of galaxies orbiting within the halo and another comprising infalling galaxies. This model provides a natural explanation for the observed sharp feature in both the fraction and velocity dispersion profiles. The significance of R_edge is further supported by a companion paper (Aung et al., 2020), which investigates three-dimensional phase space distributions of dark matter substructures in numerical simulations. The companion paper demonstrates that R_edge coincides with a suitably defined splashback radius. Overall, this study sheds light on the projected phase space structure of SDSS redMaPPer galaxy clusters and highlights the existence of an edge radius beyond which no orbiting structures are found. These findings contribute to our understanding of galaxy cluster dynamics and provide valuable insights for future studies in cosmology and astrophysics.
Created on 12 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.