## Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learning

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- Authors explore the use of expert iteration in language modeling for formal mathematics
- Expert iteration significantly outperforms traditional proof search methods with the same compute budget
- Expert iteration can autonomously navigate through a range of mathematical concepts and complexities
- State-of-the-art performance achieved on challenging high school olympiad problems using a manually curated set of problem statements
- Expert iteration enhances language modeling for formal mathematics by combining proof search and learning
- Potential impact in advancing mathematical reasoning and problem-solving capabilities

**Authors:**
Stanislas Polu,
Jesse Michael Han,
Kunhao Zheng,
Mantas Baksys,
Igor Babuschkin,
Ilya Sutskever

**Abstract:** We explore the use of expert iteration in the context of language modeling applied to formal mathematics. We show that at same compute budget, expert iteration, by which we mean proof search interleaved with learning, dramatically outperforms proof search only. We also observe that when applied to a collection of formal statements of sufficiently varied difficulty, expert iteration is capable of finding and solving a curriculum of increasingly difficult problems, without the need for associated ground-truth proofs. Finally, by applying this expert iteration to a manually curated set of problem statements, we achieve state-of-the-art on the miniF2F benchmark, automatically solving multiple challenging problems drawn from high school olympiads.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.