Measurement of carbon finance level and exploration of its influencing factors

AI-generated keywords: Carbon finance Evaluation index system Composite indicator Shannon-Spearman Measure Panel model analysis

AI-generated Key Points

  • Measurement of carbon finance level and exploration of influencing factors
  • Need for an effective evaluation index system for carbon markets
  • Proposal of the Carbon Finance Index (CFI) and use of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
  • Selection of pilot areas (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong) and screening of potential impact factors
  • Normalization, weighting, and aggregation methods used to calculate the CFI
  • Use of Shannon-Spearman Measure to determine method with least information loss
  • Significant influencing factors on carbon finance level: company size, number of patents per 10,000 people, proportion of new energy generation
  • Suggestions provided for different market entities based on research findings
  • Acknowledgment that improvement and generalization could be conducted better with sufficient data from all pilot areas
  • Potential to extend model to a large-scale carbon financial evaluation system considering national carbon market establishment
  • Data sources: CSMAR for trading volume of carbon emission quotas and standard deviation of daily trading days; pilot regional exchanges for trading volume of CCER; Local Development and Reform Commission for total number of enterprises controlling carbon emissions; WIND database for sector-related data such as "Energy Saving and Environmental Cleaning," "Green Protection," "Environmental Protection Concept," "New Energy Vehicles," etc.
  • Contribution to understanding how to measure carbon finance level effectively in order to support steady development in national carbon markets.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Peng Zhang, Yuwei Zhang, Nuo Xu

8pages, 3 figures, 14 tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Faced with increasingly severe environmental problems, carbon trading markets and related financial activities aiming at limiting carbon dioxide emissions are booming. Considering the complexity and urgency of carbon market, it is necessary to construct an effective evaluation index system. This paper selected carbon finance index as a composite indicator. Taking Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong as examples, we adopted the classic method of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to analyze the composite indicator. Potential impact factors were screened extensively and calculated through normalization, weighting by coefficient of variation and different aggregation methods. Under the measurement of Shannon-Spearman Measure, the method with the least loss of information was used to obtain the carbon finance index (CFI) of the pilot areas. Through panel model analysis, we found that company size, the number of patents per 10,000 people and the proportion of new energy generation were the factors with significant influence. Based on the research, corresponding suggestions were put forward for different market entities. Hopefully, this research will contribute to the steady development of the national carbon market.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.00189v1

This paper focuses on the measurement of carbon finance level and exploration of its influencing factors in the context of increasingly severe environmental problems and the booming carbon trading markets. The authors emphasize the need to construct an effective evaluation index system for carbon markets due to their complexity and urgency. They propose using a composite indicator called the Carbon Finance Index (CFI) and apply multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to analyze this indicator. To calculate the CFI, the authors selected Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong as pilot areas and extensively screened potential impact factors. These factors were then normalized, weighted by coefficient of variation, and aggregated using different methods. The authors used the Shannon-Spearman Measure to measure information loss and determine the method with least loss of information for obtaining the CFI. Through panel model analysis, they found that company size, number of patents per 10,000 people, and proportion of new energy generation were significant influencing factors on carbon finance level. Based on their research findings, they provide corresponding suggestions for different market entities. The authors acknowledge that improvement and generalization could be conducted better with sufficient data from all pilot areas. They also highlight the potential to extend their model to a large-scale carbon financial evaluation system considering that the establishment of a national carbon market has already started. In terms of data sources, trading volume of carbon emission quotas and standard deviation of daily trading days are obtained from CSMAR while trading volume of CCER is sourced from pilot regional exchanges. The total number of enterprises controlling carbon emissions is derived from data published by Local Development and Reform Commission. Data related to sectors such as "Energy Saving and Environmental Cleaning," "Green Protection," "Environmental Protection Concept," "New Energy Vehicles," and others are obtained from WIND database. Overall, this research contributes to understanding how to measure carbon finance level effectively in order to support steady development in national carbon markets.
Created on 29 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.