Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search
Authors: Reid Pryzant, Dan Iter, Jerry Li, Yin Tat Lee, Chenguang Zhu, Michael Zeng
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Large Language Models (LLMs) are highly dependent on hand-written prompts that require significant trial-and-error effort
- Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO) is a proposed solution to this problem
- APO is a simple and nonparametric algorithm inspired by numerical gradient descent that automatically improves prompts assuming access to training data and an LLM API
- APO uses minibatches of data to form natural language gradients that criticize the current prompt, which are then propagated into the prompt by editing it in the opposite semantic direction of the gradient
- The algorithm's gradient descent steps are guided by a beam search and bandit selection procedure which significantly increases its efficiency
- Preliminary results across three benchmark NLP tasks and the novel problem of LLM jailbreak detection show that APO can outperform prior prompt editing techniques and improve an initial prompt's performance by up to 31% by using data to rewrite vague task descriptions into more precise annotation instructions
- This paper presents a promising approach for improving LLMs' abilities without requiring extensive human input or domain knowledge.
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance as general purpose agents, but their abilities remain highly dependent on prompts which are hand written with onerous trial-and-error effort. We propose a simple and nonparametric solution to this problem, Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO), which is inspired by numerical gradient descent to automatically improve prompts, assuming access to training data and an LLM API. The algorithm uses minibatches of data to form natural language ``gradients'' that criticize the current prompt. The gradients are then ``propagated'' into the prompt by editing the prompt in the opposite semantic direction of the gradient. These gradient descent steps are guided by a beam search and bandit selection procedure which significantly improves algorithmic efficiency. Preliminary results across three benchmark NLP tasks and the novel problem of LLM jailbreak detection suggest that Automatic Prompt Optimization can outperform prior prompt editing techniques and improve an initial prompt's performance by up to 31\%, by using data to rewrite vague task descriptions into more precise annotation instructions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.