QB4AIRA: A Question Bank for AI Risk Assessment

AI-generated keywords: QB4AIRA Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment Responsible AI Ethical Principles

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has raised concerns about responsible AI development and utilization
  • QB4AIRA is a Question Bank for AI Risk Assessment introduced by Sung Une Lee et al.
  • QB4AIRA refines questions from five globally recognized AI risk frameworks and categorizes them according to Australia's AI ethics principles
  • QB4AIRA comprises 293 prioritized questions covering a wide range of AI risk areas
  • QB4AIRA addresses limitations in existing frameworks and paves the way for new risk frameworks and guidelines
  • QB4AIRA enables stakeholders to identify potential risks associated with AI deployment and take necessary measures to mitigate them
  • QB4AIRA offers a standardized approach to assess and manage risks in responsible AI deployment
  • QB4AIRA empowers stakeholders to navigate the complex landscape of AI technology responsibly while minimizing potential risks and harms.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sung Une Lee, Harsha Perera, Boming Xia, Yue Liu, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Olivier Salvado, Jon Whittle

Abstract: The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), represented by ChatGPT, has raised concerns about responsible AI development and utilization. Existing frameworks lack a comprehensive synthesis of AI risk assessment questions. To address this, we introduce QB4AIRA, a novel question bank developed by refining questions from five globally recognized AI risk frameworks, categorized according to Australia's AI ethics principles. QB4AIRA comprises 293 prioritized questions covering a wide range of AI risk areas, facilitating effective risk assessment. It serves as a valuable resource for stakeholders in assessing and managing AI risks, while paving the way for new risk frameworks and guidelines. By promoting responsible AI practices, QB4AIRA contributes to responsible AI deployment, mitigating potential risks and harms.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.09300v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), represented by ChatGPT, has sparked concerns about responsible AI development and utilization. To bridge the gap in effectively addressing potential risks and harms, Sung Une Lee et al. have introduced QB4AIRA: A Question Bank for AI Risk Assessment. This novel question bank has been developed by refining questions from five globally recognized AI risk frameworks and categorizing them according to Australia's AI ethics principles. It comprises 293 prioritized questions that cover a wide range of AI risk areas. QB4AIRA not only addresses the current limitations in existing frameworks but also paves the way for the development of new risk frameworks and guidelines. It promotes responsible AI practices by enabling stakeholders to identify potential risks associated with AI deployment and take necessary measures to mitigate them. By providing this consolidated question bank, QB4AIRA contributes significantly to the field of responsible AI deployment by offering a standardized approach to assess and manage risks. With its extensive coverage of various AI risk areas and alignment with ethical principles, QB4AIRA empowers stakeholders to navigate the complex landscape of AI technology responsibly while minimizing potential risks and harms.
Created on 26 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.