In-situ vs accreted Milky Way globular clusters: a new classification method and implications for cluster formation
AI-generated Key Points
- Belokurov and Kravtsov present a new scheme for classifying in-situ and accreted globular clusters (GCs) in the Milky Way
- The classification scheme uses total energy and the z-component of orbital angular momentum, calibrated using the [Al/Fe] abundance ratio
- In-situ GCs are distributed within the central 10 kpc of the Galaxy in a flattened configuration aligned with the Milky Way disc
- Accreted GCs have a wide distribution of distances and a spatial distribution close to spherical
- In-situ and accreted GCs have different distributions of iron abundance ([Fe/H]), with only in-situ GCs showing bimodality
- Accreted and in-situ GCs can be effectively separated based on their [Al/Fe]-[Mg/Fe] abundance ratios
- In-situ and accreted GCs follow distinct sequences in the age-[Fe/H] plane
- There is a clear disc spin-up signature in the median rotational velocity of in-situ GCs at metallicities around [Fe/H] ≈ -1.3 to -1, indicating formation of Milky Way's disc approximately 11.7–12.7 billion years ago (or at redshift z ≈ 3.1–5.3)
- High-metallicity in-situ GCs were born within Milky Way's disc while lower metallicity ones originated during early turbulent stages of Galaxy's evolution as part of its Aurora stellar component
- The authors invite comments on their classification scheme to improve understanding of formation and evolution processes related to globular clusters within our galaxy
Authors: Vasily Belokurov, Andrey Kravtsov
Abstract: We present a new scheme for the classification of the in-situ and accreted globular clusters (GCs). The scheme uses total energy $E$ and $z$-component of the orbital angular momentum and is calibrated using [Al/Fe] abundance ratio. We demonstrate that such classification results in the GC populations with distinct spatial, kinematic, and chemical abundance distributions. The in-situ GCs are distributed within the central 10 kpc of the Galaxy in a flattened configuration aligned with the MW disc, while the accreted GCs have a wide distribution of distances and a spatial distribution close to spherical. In-situ and accreted GCs have different $\rm [Fe/H]$ distributions with the well-known bimodality present only in the metallicity distribution of the in-situ GCs. Furthermore, the accreted and in-situ GCs are well separated in the plane of $\rm [Al/Fe]-[Mg/Fe]$ abundance ratios and follow distinct sequences in the age--$\rm [Fe/H]$ plane. The in-situ GCs in our classification show a clear disc spin-up signature -- the increase of median $V_\phi$ at metallicities $\rm [Fe/H]\approx -1.3\div -1$ similar to the spin-up in the in-situ field stars. This signature signals the MW's disc formation, which occurred $\approx 11.7-12.7$ Gyrs ago (or at $z\approx 3.1-5.3$) according to GC ages. In-situ GCs with metallicities of $\rm [Fe/H]\gtrsim -1.3$ were thus born in the Milky Way disc, while lower metallicity in-situ GCs were born during early, turbulent, pre-disc stages of the evolution of the Galaxy and are part of its Aurora stellar component.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.