The difficult path to coalescence: massive black hole dynamics in merging low mass dark matter haloes and galaxies

AI-generated keywords: MBHs Ketju Dynamical Friction Scouring Minor Mergers

AI-generated Key Points

  • High-resolution numerical study of sinking and merging of massive black holes (MBHs) in multiple minor mergers
  • MBH mass range: $10^3 - 10^7 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$
  • Dark matter halo mass range: $4\times 10^8 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot \lesssim \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{halo}} \lesssim 2\times 10^{10} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$
  • Utilization of simulation code Ketju, an extension of Gadget-3
  • Incorporation of unsoftened forces to account for dynamical friction and scattering effects caused by MBH binaries or multiples
  • Complex evolution paths observed for sinking MBHs including binaries, triplets, free-floating MBHs, and dynamically or recoil ejected MBHs
  • Difficulty for low-mass MBHs ($\lesssim 10^5 M_\odot$) to sink or merge; collisional interactions with dark matter can drive coalescence
  • Higher mass MBHs ($\gtrsim 10^6 M_\odot$) tend to sink to the center more frequently and trigger scouring process leading to a transformation from baryon-dominated system to dark matter-dominated system
  • Paper structure: Introduction (simulation framework Ketju and initial conditions), simulations with dark matter halos (sinking binary/triplet formation and impact on density distributions), simulations with galaxies included in dark matter halos (same discussions as previous section), results analysis and discussion, conclusion
  • Study sheds light on challenges associated with bringing/maintaining low mass MBHs in centers of low mass halos/galaxies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christian Partmann, Thorsten Naab, Antti Rantala, Anna Genina, Matias Mannerkoski, Peter H. Johansson

arXiv: 2310.08079v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
22 pages, 15 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present a high resolution numerical study of the sinking and merging of massive black holes (MBHs) with masses in the range of $10^3 - 10^7 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$ in multiple minor mergers of low mass dark matter halos without and with galaxies ($4\times 10^8 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot \lesssim \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{halo}} \lesssim 2\times 10^{10} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot)$. The Ketju simulation code, a combination of the Gadget tree solver with accurate regularised integration, uses unsoftened forces between the star/dark matter components and the MBHs for an accurate treatment of dynamical friction and scattering of dark matter/stars by MBH binaries or multiples. Post-Newtonian corrections up to order 3.5 for MBH interactions allow for coalescence by gravitational wave emission and gravitational recoil kicks. Low mass MBHs ($\lesssim 10^5 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$) hardly sink to the centre or merge. Sinking MBHs have various complex evolution paths - binaries, triplets, free-floating MBHs, and dynamically or recoil ejected MBHs. Collisional interactions with dark matter alone can drive MBHs to coalescence. The highest mass MBHs of $\gtrsim 10^6 M_\odot$ mostly sink to the centre and trigger the scouring of dark matter and stellar cores. The scouring can transform a centrally baryon dominated system to a dark matter dominated system. Our idealized high-resolution study highlights the difficulty to bring in and keep low mass MBHs in the centres of low mass halos/galaxies - a remaining challenge for merger assisted MBH seed growth mechanisms.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.08079v1

In this paper, the authors present a high-resolution numerical study of the sinking and merging of massive black holes (MBHs) in multiple minor mergers of low-mass dark matter halos with and without galaxies. The mass range of the MBHs considered is $10^3 - 10^7 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$, while the mass range of the dark matter halos is $4\times 10^8 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot \lesssim \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{halo}} \lesssim 2\times 10^{10} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$. To accurately model the dynamics of MBHs and their interaction with their stellar and dark matter environment, the authors utilize the simulation code Ketju. Ketju is an extension of the tree gravity solver Gadget-3 which has been previously introduced in other works. The code incorporates unsoftened forces between star/dark matter components and MBHs to accurately account for dynamical friction and scattering effects caused by MBH binaries or multiples. The simulations conducted in this study reveal various complex evolution paths for sinking MBHs including binaries, triplets, free-floating MBHs and dynamically or recoil ejected MBHs. It is found that low-mass MBHs ($\lesssim 10^5 M_\odot$) have difficulty sinking to the center or merging; however collisional interactions with dark matter alone can drive these low-mass MBHs to coalesce. On the other hand higher mass MBHs ($\gtrsim 10^6 M_\odot$) tend to sink to the center more frequently and trigger a process known as scouring which leads to a transformation from a baryon-dominated system to a dark matter-dominated system as both cores are affected. The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides an introduction to the simulation framework Ketju and initial conditions used in this study; Section 3 discusses simulations with dark matter halos focusing on sinking binary/triplet formation and impact on density distributions; Section 4 repeats these discussions for simulations with galaxies included in dark matter halos; results are then analyzed and discussed in section 5 followed by conclusion in section 6. This high resolution study sheds light on challenges associated with bringing/maintaining low mass MBHs in centers of low mass halos/galaxies which remains a hurdle for merger assisted seed growth mechanisms.
Created on 27 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.