AI summary · arXiv: 2310.08079v1 · astro-ph.GA

The difficult path to coalescence: massive black hole dynamics in merging low mass dark matter haloes and galaxies

Christian Partmann, Thorsten Naab, Antti Rantala, Anna Genina, Matias Mannerkoski, Peter H. Johansson

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2023 22 pages, 15 figures License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • High-resolution numerical study of sinking and merging of massive black holes (MBHs) in multiple minor mergers
  • MBH mass range: $10^3 - 10^7 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$
  • Dark matter halo mass range: $4\times 10^8 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot \lesssim \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{halo}} \lesssim 2\times 10^{10} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$
  • Utilization of simulation code Ketju, an extension of Gadget-3
  • Incorporation of unsoftened forces to account for dynamical friction and scattering effects caused by MBH binaries or multiples
  • Complex evolution paths observed for sinking MBHs including binaries, triplets, free-floating MBHs, and dynamically or recoil ejected MBHs
  • Difficulty for low-mass MBHs ($\lesssim 10^5 M_\odot$) to sink or merge; collisional interactions with dark matter can drive coalescence
  • Higher mass MBHs ($\gtrsim 10^6 M_\odot$) tend to sink to the center more frequently and trigger scouring process leading to a transformation from baryon-dominated system to dark matter-dominated system
  • Paper structure: Introduction (simulation framework Ketju and initial conditions), simulations with dark matter halos (sinking binary/triplet formation and impact on density distributions), simulations with galaxies included in dark matter halos (same discussions as previous section), results analysis and discussion, conclusion
  • Study sheds light on challenges associated with bringing/maintaining low mass MBHs in centers of low mass halos/galaxies

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: MBHs Ketju Dynamical Friction Scouring Minor Mergers

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In this paper, the authors present a high-resolution numerical study of the sinking and merging of massive black holes (MBHs) in multiple minor mergers of low-mass dark matter halos with and without galaxies. The mass range of the MBHs considered is $10^3 - 10^7 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$, while the mass range of the dark matter halos is $4\times 10^8 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot \lesssim \mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{halo}} \lesssim 2\times 10^{10} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$. To accurately model the dynamics of MBHs and their interaction with their stellar and dark matter environment, the authors utilize the simulation code Ketju. Ketju is an extension of the tree gravity solver Gadget-3 which has been previously introduced in other works. The code incorporates unsoftened forces between star/dark matter components and MBHs to accurately account for dynamical friction and scattering effects caused by MBH binaries or multiples. The simulations conducted in this study reveal various complex evolution paths for sinking MBHs including binaries, triplets, free-floating MBHs and dynamically or recoil ejected MBHs. It is found that low-mass MBHs ($\lesssim 10^5 M_\odot$) have difficulty sinking to the center or merging; however collisional interactions with dark matter alone can drive these low-mass MBHs to coalesce. On the other hand higher mass MBHs ($\gtrsim 10^6 M_\odot$) tend to sink to the center more frequently and trigger a process known as scouring which leads to a transformation from a baryon-dominated system to a dark matter-dominated system as both cores are affected. The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides an introduction to the simulation framework Ketju and initial conditions used in this study; Section 3 discusses simulations with dark matter halos focusing on sinking binary/triplet formation and impact on density distributions; Section 4 repeats these discussions for simulations with galaxies included in dark matter halos; results are then analyzed and discussed in section 5 followed by conclusion in section 6. This high resolution study sheds light on challenges associated with bringing/maintaining low mass MBHs in centers of low mass halos/galaxies which remains a hurdle for merger assisted seed growth mechanisms.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.