Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Models: Old and New Threats

AI-generated keywords: Robustness Evaluation Adversarial Attacks Large Language Models Defenses

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Challenges in enhancing the robustness of neural networks
  • Overestimation of new defense approaches due to faulty evaluations
  • Proposal of prerequisites to enhance the evaluation process and reduce faulty assessments
  • Focus on adversarial arms race in natural language processing with closed-source Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Identification of embedding space attacks as a viable threat model for generating malicious content in open-sourced models
  • Need for improved defenses against embedding space attacks
  • Analysis of a recently proposed defense approach and demonstration of overestimating robustness without tailored best practices for LLMs
  • Emphasis on accurate robustness evaluations in neural networks
  • Insights into potential threats and challenges associated with large language models
  • Importance of implementing effective defense strategies to enhance network robustness in natural language processing applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Leo Schwinn, David Dobre, Stephan Günnemann, Gauthier Gidel

Abstract: Over the past decade, there has been extensive research aimed at enhancing the robustness of neural networks, yet this problem remains vastly unsolved. Here, one major impediment has been the overestimation of the robustness of new defense approaches due to faulty defense evaluations. Flawed robustness evaluations necessitate rectifications in subsequent works, dangerously slowing down the research and providing a false sense of security. In this context, we will face substantial challenges associated with an impending adversarial arms race in natural language processing, specifically with closed-source Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Google Bard, or Anthropic's Claude. We provide a first set of prerequisites to improve the robustness assessment of new approaches and reduce the amount of faulty evaluations. Additionally, we identify embedding space attacks on LLMs as another viable threat model for the purposes of generating malicious content in open-sourced models. Finally, we demonstrate on a recently proposed defense that, without LLM-specific best practices in place, it is easy to overestimate the robustness of a new approach.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.19737v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Models: Old and New Threats," authors Leo Schwinn, David Dobre, Stephan Günnemann, and Gauthier Gidel discuss the challenges associated with enhancing the robustness of neural networks. Despite extensive research over the past decade, this problem remains largely unsolved. One major obstacle in improving robustness is the overestimation of new defense approaches due to faulty evaluations. Flawed assessments of robustness not only slow down research but also provide a false sense of security. To address this issue, the authors propose a set of prerequisites that can enhance the evaluation process and reduce the number of faulty assessments. The authors specifically focus on an impending adversarial arms race in natural language processing, particularly with closed-source Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Google Bard, or Anthropic's Claude. These LLMs pose significant challenges in terms of robustness assessment. Additionally, the authors identify embedding space attacks as another viable threat model for generating malicious content in open-sourced models. This highlights the need for improved defenses against such attacks. To demonstrate their point, the authors analyze a recently proposed defense approach. They show that without specific best practices tailored to LLMs in place, it is easy to overestimate the robustness of a new approach. Overall, this paper emphasizes the importance of accurate robustness evaluations in neural networks and provides insights into potential threats and challenges associated with large language models. By addressing these issues and implementing effective defense strategies, researchers can make significant progress towards enhancing network robustness in natural language processing applications.
Created on 12 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.