, , , ,
In this study, the researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in the context of natural language generation (NLG) tasks. The evaluation included well-known and high-performing LLMs such as ChatGPT, ChatGLM, T5-based models, LLaMA-based models, and Pythia-based models. The English dataset used for Dialogue Generation was EmpatheticDialogue, which consists of 25k empathetic conversations between a speaker and a listener. For Text Summarization, the researchers utilized the CNN/DailyMail dataset containing 93k and 220k articles from CNN and Daily Mail websites respectively, along with the XSum dataset which includes extreme summarization examples from BBC articles. Furthermore, for Chinese NLG tasks, the researchers employed the LCCC dataset for dialogue generation and THUCNews along with LCSTS for text summarization. The evaluation settings incorporated input templates and post-processing strategies to provide a common ground for comparison across different LLMs. The study reported both automatic results and detailed analysis to assess the performance of these models in NLG tasks. The paper highlighted that large language models (LLMs), particularly Transformer-based models with billions of parameters trained on extensive text corpora, have shown significant capabilities in understanding natural language and solving complex tasks. These models have demonstrated few-shot learning properties where they can perform new tasks based on textual instructions or minimal examples. The research also discussed trends in scaling these models further to enhance their capabilities. In conclusion, the comprehensive assessment of various LLMs in NLG tasks revealed notable trends and phenomena that shed light on their multilingual capabilities. The results from both automatic evaluations and manual analyses provided valuable insights into the performance of these models across different languages and datasets.
- - Researchers evaluated large language models (LLMs) in natural language generation (NLG) tasks
- - Evaluated models included ChatGPT, ChatGLM, T5-based models, LLaMA-based models, and Pythia-based models
- - Used EmpatheticDialogue dataset for Dialogue Generation and CNN/DailyMail dataset along with XSum dataset for Text Summarization
- - Employed LCCC dataset for Chinese dialogue generation and THUCNews along with LCSTS for Chinese text summarization
- - Highlighted capabilities of Transformer-based LLMs with billions of parameters in understanding natural language and solving complex tasks
- - Noted few-shot learning properties of these models allowing them to perform new tasks based on textual instructions or minimal examples
- - Discussed trends in scaling these models further to enhance their capabilities
SummaryResearchers tested big language models in tasks that involve creating sentences. They used different models like ChatGPT and T5-based ones. For talking and writing short news, they used special sets of information. They also tried these models with Chinese language. These models are good at understanding words and doing hard jobs. They can learn quickly from small amounts of text and do new things easily.
Definitions- Researchers: People who study things to learn more about them.
- Language Models (LLMs): Programs that help computers understand and create human languages.
- Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks: Tasks where computers make sentences that sound like people wrote them.
- Dataset: A collection of information or data for studying or testing something.
- Transformer-based LLMs: Advanced programs that use a specific method to understand languages better.
- Parameters: Settings or values that control how a program works.
- Few-shot learning: Learning quickly from only a little bit of information.
- Scaling: Making something bigger or stronger to improve its abilities.
Introduction
Natural language generation (NLG) is a crucial aspect of artificial intelligence that aims to generate human-like text or speech from structured data. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), there has been a growing interest in their capabilities for NLG tasks. These models, particularly Transformer-based ones with billions of parameters, have shown impressive performance in understanding natural language and solving complex tasks. In this study, researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of various LLMs in the context of NLG tasks such as dialogue generation and text summarization.
The Evaluation Process
The researchers utilized well-known and high-performing LLMs such as ChatGPT, ChatGLM, T5-based models, LLaMA-based models, and Pythia-based models for their evaluation. The English dataset used for Dialogue Generation was EmpatheticDialogue which consists of 25k empathetic conversations between a speaker and a listener. For Text Summarization, the researchers employed the CNN/DailyMail dataset containing 93k and 220k articles from CNN and Daily Mail websites respectively, along with the XSum dataset which includes extreme summarization examples from BBC articles. Additionally, Chinese NLG tasks were evaluated using the LCCC dataset for dialogue generation and THUCNews along with LCSTS for text summarization.
To provide a common ground for comparison across different LLMs, input templates and post-processing strategies were incorporated into the evaluation settings. This allowed for fair assessment of each model's performance without any external biases or variations in input data.
Automatic Results
The results from automatic evaluations showed that all LLMs performed well on both dialogue generation and text summarization tasks across different datasets. However, some models showed better performance than others depending on the specific task at hand.
For dialogue generation in English using EmpatheticDialogue dataset, ChatGPT and ChatGLM models outperformed others in terms of automatic evaluation metrics such as BLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR scores. However, for text summarization in English using CNN/DailyMail dataset, T5-based models showed the best performance.
In Chinese NLG tasks, LLaMA-based models performed better on dialogue generation while Pythia-based models excelled in text summarization.
Manual Analysis
Apart from automatic evaluations, the researchers also conducted a detailed manual analysis to assess the performance of LLMs in NLG tasks. This involved examining generated outputs from each model and comparing them with human-written texts. The analysis revealed interesting trends and phenomena that provided valuable insights into the capabilities of these models.
One notable trend was the few-shot learning properties of LLMs where they could perform new tasks based on textual instructions or minimal examples. This showcases their ability to adapt and generalize to different contexts without extensive training data.
Furthermore, the study also highlighted challenges faced by these models such as generating repetitive or irrelevant responses. These issues were more prevalent in dialogue generation compared to text summarization tasks.
Trends in Scaling LLMs
The research paper also discussed trends in scaling LLMs further to enhance their capabilities for NLG tasks. With advancements in hardware and techniques like parallel processing and distributed training, there has been a significant increase in model sizes over recent years. This has led to improved performance on various NLP benchmarks but has also raised concerns about computational costs and ethical implications of using such large-scale language models.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of various LLMs in NLG tasks across different languages and datasets. The results from both automatic evaluations and manual analyses shed light on their multilingual capabilities as well as challenges faced by these models. Additionally, it highlights trends in scaling LLMs and their few-shot learning properties. This research serves as a valuable resource for understanding the performance of LLMs in NLG tasks and provides insights for future developments in this field.