Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.09801v1

, , , , In this paper, the authors introduce a novel writing method called Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT) that aims to prevent students from cheating using Large Language Models (LLMs) while enhancing their active learning through engagement with such models. LLMs, such as ChatGPT, have disrupted education and other fields, but concerns about cheating and the presence of fake facts have led many educators to ban their use. The authors conduct studies with ProCoT in two different courses involving a total of 66 students. In these studies, students are asked to prompt an LLM with a question and then affirm or refute statements in the LLM's output using peer-reviewed references. <ks> ProCoT: A Novel Writing Method for Cheating Prevention Using LLMs in Active Learning Environments </ks> The results of the studies reveal two important findings. Firstly, ProCoT stimulates creative and critical thinking in students compared to solely relying on LLM output. Secondly, ProCoT proves effective in preventing cheating because it exposes clear limitations in existing LLMs when comparing students' ProCoT output to LLM-generated ProCoT output. Additionally, the authors find that most students prefer giving answers in fewer words than LLMs typically produce. <ks> Stimulating Critical Thinking: The Effectiveness of ProCoT for Preventing Cheating Using LLMs </ks> Expanding on the existing summary, the authors highlight that ProCoT will provide valuable data for further training LLMs without privacy issues. The paper is organized into sections discussing background and literature review (Section 2), detailed methods including case studies (Section 3), outcome and results with statistical analysis (Section 4), and concluding remarks (Section 5). The background section emphasizes the pedagogy of essay writing evaluation, which requires a comprehensive approach focusing on student learning and development. Rubrics play a central role in evaluating essays by outlining expected criteria such as argument strength, use of evidence/references, and organization of ideas. Formative evaluation based on quality feedback helps students identify strengths and weaknesses while fostering a growth mindset. <ks> ProCoT: A Comprehensive Approach to Cheating Prevention Using LLMs in Active Learning </ks> Peer review and self-assessment are also important aspects of pedagogy, as they promote critical thinking skills and encourage students to reflect on their own writing. Reflection fosters independence and confidence in writing, contributing to the overall development of students as critical thinkers and skilled writers. The literature review also delves into Large Language Models (LLMs), which aim to mimic human language patterns and structures after extensive training on big data. These models, based on the Transformer architecture, are trained for Natural Language Processing tasks like reading comprehension, summarization, and question answering. <ks> Enhancing Critical Thinking: Exploring ProCoT's Potential for Cheating Prevention Using LLMs </ks> The authors provide quantitative plots of ProCoT's number of words in student answers for one case study. They compare the quality of ProCoT answers grounded by references with those generated by ChatGPT and Phind. While ChatGPT tends to give more comprehensive but not always factual answers, Phind may also provide verbose responses but lacks originality. The analysis shows that students' ProCoT answers have better quality based on grounding by references compared to both ChatGPT and Phind. <ks> Improving LLM Models: Evaluating ProCoT's Effectiveness for Cheating Prevention Through Quality Feedback </ks> Overall, this paper presents Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT) as a promising method for preventing cheating using LLMs while promoting active learning.

• - Introduction of Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT) as a novel writing method for preventing cheating using Large Language Models (LLMs)
• - Studies conducted with ProCoT in two different courses involving 66 students
• - Findings:
• - ProCoT stimulates creative and critical thinking in students compared to solely relying on LLM output
• - ProCoT proves effective in preventing cheating by exposing limitations in existing LLMs
• - Most students prefer giving answers in fewer words than LLMs typically produce
• - ProCoT provides valuable data for further training LLMs without privacy issues
• - Paper organized into sections discussing background, literature review, methods, outcomes/results, and concluding remarks
• - Emphasis on the pedagogy of essay writing evaluation, including rubrics and formative evaluation based on quality feedback
• - Peer review and self-assessment promote critical thinking skills and reflection in writing
• - Overview of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their training process using big data
• - Comparison of student answers generated by ProCoT, ChatGPT, and Phind shows that ProCoT answers have better quality based on grounding by references

Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT) is a new way of writing that helps stop cheating by using Large Language Models (LLMs). Researchers tested ProCoT with 66 students in two different classes. They found that ProCoT makes students think more creatively and critically compared to just using LLMs. It also helps prevent cheating by showing the limits of LLMs. Most students prefer giving shorter answers than what LLMs usually produce. Using ProCoT gives important information for training LLMs without privacy issues. Definitions- Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT): A method of writing that prevents cheating and uses Large Language Models (LLMs). - Large Language Models (LLMs): Computer programs that can generate human-like text. - Cheating: When someone tries to gain an unfair advantage, like copying someone else's work. - Creative thinking: Coming up with new ideas or solutions. - Critical thinking: Thinking carefully about something and making judgments based on evidence. - Privacy issues: Concerns about keeping personal information private and secure.

Introduction

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention in the field of education. These models, such as ChatGPT, are trained on large datasets and can generate human-like text responses to prompts. While they have shown great potential for enhancing learning and writing skills, concerns about cheating and the presence of fake facts have led many educators to ban their use. To address these concerns, a group of researchers introduced a new writing method called Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT). This method aims to prevent students from cheating using LLMs while also promoting active learning through engagement with such models. In this article, we will delve into the details of this research paper titled "ProCoT: A Novel Writing Method for Cheating Prevention Using LLMs in Active Learning Environments" and discuss its findings.

Background and Literature Review

The authors begin by discussing the pedagogy of essay writing evaluation. They highlight the importance of a comprehensive approach that focuses on student learning and development rather than just evaluating the final product. Rubrics play a crucial role in this process by outlining expected criteria such as argument strength, use of evidence/references, and organization of ideas. Formative evaluation based on quality feedback is also essential in promoting student growth mindset. Peer review and self-assessment are effective methods for encouraging critical thinking skills and fostering independence in writing. The literature review also delves into Large Language Models (LLMs) which aim to mimic human language patterns after extensive training on big data. These models are based on Transformer architecture and are trained for Natural Language Processing tasks like reading comprehension, summarization, and question answering.

Methods

The authors conducted studies with ProCoT in two different courses involving 66 students. In these studies, students were asked to prompt an LLM with a question and then affirm or refute statements in the LLM's output using peer-reviewed references.

Case Studies

The first case study involved 36 students, and the second one had 30 students. In both studies, students were given a prompt and asked to generate an answer using ProCoT. The authors also compared these answers with those generated by ChatGPT and Phind.

Results

The results of the studies revealed two important findings. Firstly, ProCoT stimulates creative and critical thinking in students compared to solely relying on LLM output. Secondly, it proves effective in preventing cheating because it exposes clear limitations in existing LLMs when comparing student-generated ProCoT output to LLM-generated ProCoT output. Additionally, the authors found that most students prefer giving answers in fewer words than LLMs typically produce. This shows that ProCoT not only promotes critical thinking but also encourages concise writing skills.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper presents Probing Chain of Thought (ProCoT) as a promising method for preventing cheating using LLMs while promoting active learning. It provides valuable data for further training LLMs without privacy issues and has shown to be more effective than existing methods such as ChatGPT and Phind. With its focus on critical thinking and quality feedback, ProCoT has the potential to enhance student learning and development in writing skills.