GaiaUnlimited: The old stellar disc of the Milky Way as traced by the Red Clump

AI-generated keywords: Milky Way

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study by Khanna et al. (2024) explores Milky Way's structural parameters using Red Clump (RC) giants
  • RC giants are standard candles with minimal intrinsic variability, enabling accurate distance estimations
  • Data from AllWISE mid-infrared survey, Gaia survey, Gaia Data Release 3 astrometry, and 3D extinction maps used to map stellar density across Galactic disc
  • Approximately 10 million \rc{}-like stars identified with high confidence in curated catalogue
  • Two-disc model fitted to constrain parameters like scale height (\hz{}) and scale length (\rd{}) for thin and thick discs
  • Results show flared thin disc with \rd{}=$3.56\pm0.32$ kpc and \hzsun{}=$0.17\pm0.01$ kpc; shorter, thicker disc with \rd{}=$2.59\pm0.11$ kpc and \hzsun{}=$0.45\pm0.11$ kpc identified
  • Thicker disc accounts for 64% of \rc{} stellar mass beyond 3 kpc; thin disk shows warping beyond 9 kpc from Galactic center
  • Discrepancies between predicted RC star number densities and actual counts suggest potential two-armed spiral perturbations within Milky Way's disc structure
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shourya Khanna, Jie Yu, Ronald Drimmel, Eloisa Poggio, Tristan Cantat-Gaudin, Alfred Castro-Ginard, Evgeny Kurbatov, Vasily Belokurov, Anthony Brown, Morgan Fouesneau, Andrew Casey, Hans-Walter Rix

arXiv: 2410.22036v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
27 pages, submitted to A&A
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present an exploration of the Milky Way's structural parameters using an all-sky sample of RC giants to map the stellar density from the inner to the outer parts of the Galactic disc. These evolved giants are considered to be standard candles due to their low intrinsic variance in their absolute luminosities, allowing us to estimate their distances with reasonable confidence. We exploit all-sky photometry from the AllWISE mid-infrared survey and the Gaia survey, along with astrometry from Gaia Data Release 3 and recent 3D extinction maps, to develop a probabilistic scheme in order to select with high confidence \rc{}-like stars. Our curated catalogue contains about 10 million sources, for which we estimate photometric distances based on the WISE $W1$ photometry. We then derive the selection function for our sample, which is the combined selection function of sources with both \gaia{} and \allwise{} photometry. Using the distances and accounting for the full selection function of our observables, we are able to fit a two-disc, multi-parameter model to constrain the scale height (\hz{}), scale-length (\rd{}), flaring, and the relative mass ratios of the two disc components. We illustrate and verify our methodology using mock catalogues of \rc{} stars. We find that the \rc{} population is best described by a flared thin disc with scale length \rd{}=$3.56\pm0.32$ kpc and scale height at the Sun of \hzsun{}=$0.17\pm0.01$ kpc, and a shorter and thicker disc with \rd{}=$2.59\pm0.11$ kpc, \hzsun{}=$0.45\pm0.11$ kpc, with no flare. The thicker disc constitutes 64\% of the \rc{} stellar mass beyond 3 kpc, while the thin disk shows evidence of being warped beyond 9 kpc from the Galactic center. The residuals between the predicted number density of RC stars from our axisymmetric model and the measured counts show possible evidence of a two-armed spiral perturbation in the disc of the Milky Way.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.22036v1

, , , , In their study, Khanna et al. (2024) present a comprehensive exploration of the structural parameters of the Milky Way by utilizing an all-sky sample of Red Clump (RC) giants. These RC giants are considered standard candles due to their minimal intrinsic variability in absolute luminosities, allowing for accurate distance estimations. The researchers use data from the AllWISE mid-infrared survey and Gaia survey, along with astrometry from Gaia Data Release 3 and recent 3D extinction maps, to map the stellar density across the Galactic disc from its inner to outer regions. Through a probabilistic selection scheme, they identify \rc{}-like stars with high confidence and create a curated catalogue comprising approximately 10 million sources. By estimating photometric distances based on WISE $W1$ photometry and deriving the selection function for their sample—combining \gaia{} and \allwise{} photometry—the team fits a two-disc, multi-parameter model to constrain key parameters such as scale height (\hz{}) and scale length (\rd{}) for both thin and thick discs. Their methodology is validated using mock catalogues of \rc{} stars. The results indicate that the RC population is best described by a flared thin disc with a scale length of \rd{}=$3.56\pm0.32$ kpc and a scale height at the Sun of \hzsun{}=$0.17\pm0.01$ kpc. Additionally, they identify a shorter and thicker disc with \rd{}=$2.59\pm0.11$ kpc and \hzsun{}=$0.45\pm0.11$ kpc, lacking flare characteristics. The thicker disc accounts for 64% of the \rc{} stellar mass beyond 3 kpc, while evidence suggests that the thin disk exhibits warping beyond 9 kpc from the Galactic center. Moreover, discrepancies between predicted RC star number densities from their axisymmetric model and actual counts hint at potential two-armed spiral perturbations within the Milky Way's disc structure—an intriguing finding that warrants further investigation into possible effects of incorrect dust models on these observations. Overall, this study sheds light on the intricate dynamics of our Galaxy's old stellar disc through meticulous analysis of RC giants' distribution across different Galactic regions, offering valuable insights into its structural properties and potential spiral perturbations within its disc morphology.
Created on 30 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.