The environments of radio galaxies and quasars in LoTSS data release 2

AI-generated keywords: radio galaxies quasars orientation-based unification scheme LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS DR2) galaxy clusters

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study examines orientation-based unification scheme for radio-loud AGNs
  • Data from LoTSS DR2 used to compare environments of 26,577 radio galaxies and 2028 quasars (z range: 0.08 < z < 0.4)
  • Radio galaxies classified into LERGs and HERGs based on optical spectra
  • Approximately $17.1 \pm 0.2%$ of radio galaxies and $4.1 \pm 0.4%$ of quasars associated with galaxy clusters
  • Luminous quasars less common in clusters compared to LERGs and HERGs
  • HERGs and LERGs tend to reside in central regions of galaxy clusters, while quasars show no strong preference
  • Findings challenge orientation-based unification model, suggesting other factors beyond viewing angle play significant role
  • Future surveys like WEAVE-LOFAR expected to provide more comprehensive data for larger sample, allowing deeper exploration of AGN environments
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tong Pan, Yuming Fu, H. J. A. Rottgering, R. J. van Weeren, A. B. Drake, B. H. Yue, J. W. Petley

arXiv: 2503.01055v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
9 pages, 6 figures. Accepted for publication by A&A

Abstract: Aims. The orientation-based unification scheme of radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs) asserts that radio galaxies and quasars are essentially the same type of object, but viewed from different angles. To test this unification model, we compared the environments of radio galaxies and quasars, which would reveal similar properties when an accurate model is utilized. Methods. Using the second data release of the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS DR2), we constructed a sample of 26,577 radio galaxies and 2028 quasars at 0.08 < z < 0.4. For radio galaxies with optical spectra, we further classified them as 3631 low-excitation radio galaxies (LERGs) and 1143 high-excitation radio galaxies (HERGs). We crossmatched these samples with two galaxy cluster catalogs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Results. We find that $17.1 \pm 0.2%$ of the radio galaxies and $4.1 \pm 0.4%$ of the quasars are associated with galaxy clusters. Luminous quasars are very rare in clusters, while $18.7 \pm 0.7%$ LERGs and $15.2 \pm 1.1%$ HERGs reside in clusters. We also note that in radio galaxies, both HERGs and LERGs tend to reside in the centers of clusters, while quasars do not show a strong preference for their positions in clusters. Conclusions. This study shows that local quasars and radio galaxies exist in different environments, challenging the orientation-based unification model. This means that factors other than orientation may play an important role in distinguishing radio galaxies from quasars. The future WEAVE-LOFAR survey will offer high-quality spectroscopic data for a large number of radio sources and allow for a more comprehensive exploration of the environments of radio galaxies and quasars.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.01055v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study "The Environments of Radio Galaxies and Quasars in LoTSS Data Release 2" by Tong Pan, Yuming Fu, H. J. A. Rottgering, R. J. van Weeren, A. B. Drake, B. H. Yue, and J.W Petley examines the orientation-based unification scheme for radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs). The authors use data from the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS DR2) to compare the environments of 26,577 radio galaxies and 2028 quasars within a redshift range of 0.08 < z < 0.4. They also classify radio galaxies into low-excitation (LERGs) and high-excitation (HERGs) categories based on their optical spectra. By crossmatching these samples with galaxy cluster catalogs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), the researchers find that approximately $17.1 \pm 0.2%$ of radio galaxies and $4.1 \pm 0.4%$ of quasars are associated with galaxy clusters. Interestingly, luminous quasars are less common in clusters compared to LERGs and HERGs. Furthermore, the study reveals that both HERGs and LERGs tend to reside in the central regions of galaxy clusters while quasars do not show a strong preference for any particular location within these structures. These findings challenge the orientation-based unification model by suggesting that factors beyond just viewing angle may play a significant role in differentiating between radio galaxies and quasars based on their environmental characteristics. Looking ahead, future surveys like WEAVE-LOFAR are expected to provide more comprehensive data for a larger sample of radio sources, allowing for a deeper exploration of the environments surrounding these objects. This study provides valuable insights into the distinct properties and distributions of different types of AGNs in varying cosmic environments, shedding light on the complexities underlying their classification and evolution processes in the universe.
Created on 10 Apr. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.