The SAGA Survey. V. Modeling Satellite Systems around Milky Way-mass Galaxies with Updated UniverseMachine
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Researchers Yunchong Wang, Ethan O. Nadler, Yao-Yuan Mao, Risa H. Wechsler, Tom Abel, Peter Behroozi, and Marla Geha focus on the role of environment in shaping low-mass galaxy assembly.
- The study utilizes the UniverseMachine (UM) framework and data from the Satellites Around Galactic Analogs (SAGA) Survey Data Release 3 to analyze dwarf galaxy star formation and quenching within a cosmological context.
- A new quenching model tailored for galaxies with stellar masses less than $10^9$ solar masses is incorporated into UM and constrained using observations from SAGA satellites around Milky Way-mass hosts and isolated field galaxies from SDSS.
- The resulting 'UM-SAGA' model successfully replicates key aspects observed in SAGA satellites while maintaining isolated dwarfs in a star-forming state.
- Higher levels of quenching are observed in satellites compared to isolated field galaxies, highlighting the importance of halo assembly processes in environmental quenching patterns.
- Projections indicate a significant difference in quenched fraction between isolated field galaxies and satellites orbiting MW-mass hosts at specific stellar mass ranges.
- The study suggests upcoming spectroscopic surveys can help validate predictions regarding internal feedback mechanisms, mass dynamics, gas processes, and reionization events influencing faint low-mass galaxy evolution.
Authors: Yunchong Wang (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Ethan O. Nadler (Carnegie Obs), Yao-Yuan Mao (U Utah), Risa H. Wechsler (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Tom Abel (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Peter Behroozi (U Arizona/Steward), Marla Geha (Yale), Yasmeen Asali (Yale), Mithi A. C. de los Reyes (Amherst College), Erin Kado-Fong (Yale), Nitya Kallivayalil (U Virginia), Erik J. Tollerud (STScI), Benjamin Weiner (U Arizona/Steward), John F. Wu (STScI)
Abstract: Environment plays a critical role in shaping the assembly of low-mass galaxies. Here, we use the UniverseMachine (UM) galaxy-halo connection framework and the Data Release 3 of the Satellites Around Galactic Analogs (SAGA) Survey to place dwarf galaxy star formation and quenching into a cosmological context. UM is a data-driven forward model that flexibly parameterizes galaxy star formation rates (SFR) using only halo mass and assembly history. We add a new quenching model to UM, tailored for galaxies with stellar masses $\lesssim 10^9$ solar masses, and constrain the model down to a stellar mass $\gtrsim 10^7$ solar masses using new SAGA observations of 101 satellite systems around Milky Way (MW)-mass hosts and a sample of isolated field galaxies in a similar mass range from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The new best-fit model, 'UM-SAGA,' reproduces the satellite stellar mass functions, average SFRs, and quenched fractions in SAGA satellites while keeping isolated dwarfs mostly star forming. The enhanced quenching in satellites relative to isolated field galaxies leads the model to maximally rely on halo assembly to explain the observed environmental quenching. Extrapolating the model down to a stellar mass $\sim 10^{6.5}$ solar masses yields a quenched fraction of $\gtrsim$ 30% for isolated field galaxies and $\gtrsim$ 80% for satellites of MW-mass hosts at this stellar mass. This specific prediction can soon be tested by spectroscopic surveys to reveal the relative importance of internal feedback, cessation of mass and gas accretion, satellite-specific gas processes, and reionization for the evolution of faint low-mass galaxies.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.