ChatChecker: A Framework for Dialogue System Testing and Evaluation Through Non-cooperative User Simulation

AI-generated keywords: Dialogue systems Large language models Comprehensive assessment Automated evaluation Non-cooperative user simulation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Reliance on large language models (LLMs) is crucial in modern dialogue systems
  • Dialogue systems involve integration of multiple LLMs, external tools, and databases
  • Evaluation and testing of dialogue systems should be conducted holistically
  • ChatChecker is a cutting-edge framework for automated evaluation and testing of dialogue systems
  • ChatChecker uses LLMs to simulate user interactions, pinpoint breakdowns, and assess quality
  • ChatChecker does not require reference dialogues and operates independently from the target system's implementation
  • Improved breakdown detection performance in ChatChecker due to error taxonomy in evaluation prompts
  • Novel non-cooperative user simulator in ChatChecker helps uncover weaknesses in dialogue systems effectively
  • ChatChecker offers a thorough and scalable testing solution for accelerating development of robust dialogue systems
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Roman Mayr, Michel Schimpf, Thomas Bohné

Abstract: While modern dialogue systems heavily rely on large language models (LLMs), their implementation often goes beyond pure LLM interaction. Developers integrate multiple LLMs, external tools, and databases. Therefore, assessment of the underlying LLM alone does not suffice, and the dialogue systems must be tested and evaluated as a whole. However, this remains a major challenge. With most previous work focusing on turn-level analysis, less attention has been paid to integrated dialogue-level quality assurance. To address this, we present ChatChecker, a framework for automated evaluation and testing of complex dialogue systems. ChatChecker uses LLMs to simulate diverse user interactions, identify dialogue breakdowns, and evaluate quality. Compared to previous approaches, our design reduces setup effort and is generalizable, as it does not require reference dialogues and is decoupled from the implementation of the target dialogue system. We improve breakdown detection performance over a prior LLM-based approach by including an error taxonomy in the prompt. Additionally, we propose a novel non-cooperative user simulator based on challenging personas that uncovers weaknesses in target dialogue systems more effectively. Through this, ChatChecker contributes to thorough and scalable testing. This enables both researchers and practitioners to accelerate the development of robust dialogue systems.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jul. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2507.16792v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of modern dialogue systems, the reliance on large language models (LLMs) is paramount. However, the implementation of these systems often extends beyond mere LLM interaction, involving the integration of multiple LLMs, external tools, and databases. This complexity necessitates that evaluation and testing of dialogue systems be conducted holistically rather than focusing solely on the underlying LLM. Despite this need for comprehensive assessment, it remains a significant challenge in the field. Previous research has predominantly concentrated on analyzing dialogue at the turn level, neglecting integrated dialogue-level quality assurance. To address this gap, Roman Mayr, Michel Schimpf, and Thomas Bohné introduce ChatChecker—a cutting-edge framework designed for automated evaluation and testing of intricate dialogue systems. ChatChecker leverages LLMs to simulate diverse user interactions, pinpoint dialogue breakdowns, and assess overall quality. What sets ChatChecker apart from prior approaches is its streamlined setup process and generalizability; it does not require reference dialogues and operates independently from the target dialogue system's implementation. One notable enhancement in ChatChecker is its improved breakdown detection performance compared to previous LLM-based methods. This advancement is achieved by incorporating an error taxonomy in the prompt used for evaluation. Additionally, the authors propose a novel non-cooperative user simulator based on challenging personas to more effectively uncover weaknesses in target dialogue systems. By offering a thorough and scalable testing solution through innovative methodologies like non-cooperative user simulation, ChatChecker paves the way for accelerated development of robust dialogue systems. Researchers and practitioners alike stand to benefit from this framework as they strive towards enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of modern conversational AI technologies.
Created on 23 Jul. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.